IDSC 480 01

WAYS TO WISDOM

FALL 2006



INSTRUCTORS: DR. MICHAEL ANDREGG & DR. STEPHEN J. LAUMAKIS

OFFICES: MCCARTHY GYM & 207 JRC

PHONE: 962-5907 & 962-5363

OFFICE HOURS: 6-10 M-F & BY APPOINTMENT (MA)
8:30-9:30 MWF & 2-3 WF & BY APPOINTMENT (SL)

SEMINAR DESCRIPTION/GOALS:

“Ways to Wisdom” explores the concepts of “wisdom” and “ways/paths” to it from “cultures” throughout the world. The seminar will be organized topically and geographically, focusing on both Western and non-Western accounts of the goals and paths to “wisdom.” Topics to be considered include: the nature of wisdom, the means of pursuing and acquiring it, the subjective and environmental conditions necessary for its pursuit and acquisition, and the costs and benefits of this for the individual, his or her community, and the world.
In order to focus the subject matter of the seminar we will pay particular attention to two topics: the ethical and epistemic dimensions of wisdom. With respect to the former, we will pay particular attention to the practical consequences or actions that are thought to be required for and follow from the pursuit of “wisdom.” With respect to the latter, attention will be paid to a broad spectrum of cognitive categories ranging from sense data to knowledge to understanding to enlightenment and ultimately to wisdom. The views to be considered include: Greek, Roman, Chinese, Buddhist, Christian, Jewish, Indian, African, Native American, Western Scientific, and even the American “intelligence community.”

SEMINAR STRUCTURE:


Students will be assigned weekly readings, and be asked to participate in an on-line discussion of the readings as well as to prepare a 1-2 page reaction paper for class each week. Class time will be devoted to discussion and to student presentations based on the readings. Students will be evaluated based on general class discussion and participation, short weekly reaction papers, in-class presentations and discussion leading.

TEXTS:


Readings are selected for each class, partly by the professors and partly by students assigned to each of 8 class sessions. Student discussion leaders will meet with the instructors (at least two weeks prior to their discussion leading) to discuss the readings they will be using and the topics/themes they will be addressing. Discussion leaders will then formulate and post (at the seminar Blackboard site) specific questions about the readings that will serve as the basis of class discussion.

ASSIGNMENTS:


Reading of assigned materials is a MUST in order to introduce you to the subject matter, facilitate class discussion and participation, pose distressing questions, and just plain make you think. Students will be responsible for three areas of activity: 1) Participation, 2) Reaction Papers, and 3) Discussion Leading.


1) PARTICIPATION includes class discussion of the assigned readings and Web postings at the Threaded Discussion Area arranged for the seminar.

2) REACTION PAPERS are 1-2 TYPED PAGES in length and are based on pre-assigned readings. These ten (10) papers involve a critical analysis/reflection on the texts. The papers will be evaluated on a “+/0/-“ scale. “-“ is missing or deficient (D-F). “0” is an adequate summary with little or no analysis (B-C). “+” is a thoughtful, critical analysis (A).

3) DISCUSSION LEADING consists of forming a group of 2 students (by WEEK #2), selecting a topic (by WEEK #2), and leading class discussion during the week you present the issues involved in your topic. Discussion leaders are evaluated on four dimensions: a) the quality of readings they select, b) the quality of questions they create to stimulate learning among other students, c) the quality of a short presentation each will make to start off their sessions, and d) the skill by which they moderate discussion during their session.

ATTENDANCE POLICY:


Attendance is expected. Excessive absence may result in grade reduction. Excessive absence means more than once unless you have a letter from a significant deity. Turn off cell phones!

GRADE DISTRIBUTION:


Class Participation/Web = 40%
Reaction Papers = 40%
Discussion Leading = 20%